While Americans struggled
to win the independence of the United States, they were also creating new
republican institutions of government to replace royal authority. In the
process they had to work out the full implications—political, social, and
intellectual—of life in a republican nation.
A
|
New Political Institutions
|
The collapse of royal
authority in America in 1775 did not lead to a breakdown of public order.
Instead, the provincial assemblies, local county courts, and town meetings
simply added the tasks previously performed by the imperial government to their
traditional functions. The transfer of power was given legitimacy by state
constitutions, which were written and ratified by the assemblies between 1776
and 1780.
The new constitutions
were republican because they derived their legitimacy from the consent of the
people—also known as the doctrine of popular sovereignty—and created
representative political institutions. However, in structure, the new
governments closely resembled those of the colonial period. Most states had an
elected governor, a legislature of two houses, and property qualifications for
voting.
There were, however, several
significant variations. The most democratic of the new constitutions was that
of Pennsylvania, ratified in 1776. It bestowed the vote on all adult white
taxpayers and, to encourage majority rule, provided for only one house in the
legislature and curtailed the powers of the governor. In sharp contrast, the
aristocratic constitution of South Carolina imposed high property
qualifications for voting and even higher restrictions for officeholding. These
political differences reflected the contrasting societies of the two states.
Pennsylvania’s democratic institutions resulted from the coming to power,
during the revolution, of a coalition of social groups from the middling ranks:
independent farmers, established artisans, and Scots-Irish Presbyterians. South
Carolina’s elitist government was designed to protect the interests of a
relatively small group of rich, slave-owning white planters.
Other constitutional provisions
had historical or ideological origins. Some state charters included a bill of
individual rights while most of the others had specific clauses that guaranteed
traditional English legal rights, such as freedom from arbitrary searches,
trial by jury, and protection of property. The documents also reflected
Enlightenment values, such as guaranteeing religious toleration.
In some states, such as
Pennsylvania and Massachusetts, the new constitutions were approved only after
fierce political battles. In other states, primarily those in the South, the
governmental institutions given legitimacy in the new documents excluded the
majority of the people—white as well as black—from a role in the political
process. But everywhere the new charters were generally accepted, allowing a
stable transition to republican government.
B
|
Toward a New Religious Order
|
Before 1776 most Americans
lived in colonies with established churches. All members of the community were
assumed to be members of that church (the Church of England in the South, the
Congregational Church in New England) and they were required by law to
contribute to the support of the minister. Only Pennsylvania and Rhode Island,
founded by Quakers and Baptists respectively, had no established church and
allowed religious freedom.
Independence brought significant
changes in American religious institutions, particularly in the South. Patriots
who were members of the Church of England repudiated their allegiance to the
king, the head of that church, and formed the Protestant Episcopal Church of
America. Most of the leading planters in Virginia were Episcopalians and, to
win support for the war effort from Presbyterians and Baptists, they had the
Virginia Convention of 1776 issue a Declaration of Rights that guaranteed
religious toleration. Then in 1786 the Virginia legislature passed Thomas
Jefferson’s Bill for Establishing Religious Freedom. It declared that all
churches had the same legal rights and that no church should receive direct
financial support from the state. New York and New Jersey adopted similar
legislation.
Even as the Southern and
mid-Atlantic states were moving toward a separation of church and state, some
citizens wanted to maintain the traditional European system of established
churches. They felt that state support for religion would promote morality and
respect for authority. These sentiments were particularly strong in New
England, where there were close links between state government and the established
Congregational Church. There were relatively few members of other religious
faiths, and most New England ministers had enthusiastically supported the
Patriot cause. For these reasons, Massachusetts and Connecticut maintained an
established church until the 1830s. However they allowed Baptists and
Methodists to support their own ministers. Thus, following the American
Revolution, there was a general movement toward religious freedom.
C
|
Economic Problems
|
In many respects the creation
of a new political order was much easier than forging a new financial and
economic system. During the War of Independence, British warships temporarily
destroyed the New England fishing industry and seized many American merchant
ships. Both the tobacco and the rice exporting states of the South and the
grain-marketing regions of the North suffered from the disruption of Atlantic
trade. The port cities had the greatest difficulty. Boston, New York,
Philadelphia, Charleston, and Newport were occupied for a time by British
troops and suffered drastic declines in population as trade virtually ceased.
Peace did not bring a
return to prewar prosperity. The United States was now outside the British
Empire and could no longer count on special preferences and subsidies. Angry
over unpaid debts, some British merchants refused to handle Chesapeake tobacco
exports, cutting American sales. Without a financial subsidy from the British
government, South Carolina’s once-lucrative indigo industry nearly vanished.
Because of the British Navigation Acts, American-owned ships could no longer
trade with the sugar islands in the British West Indies.
The result was a commercial
recession that lasted for nearly two decades. In 1790 the value of American
exports per capita was only two-thirds of what it had been in 1774.
Nevertheless, low-priced British goods flooded into the United States, driving
many artisans out of business. Responding to artisan protests, New York, Rhode
Island, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts imposed tariffs on imported manufactures.
The American standard of living declined, increasing the potential for conflict
among competing economic groups.
D
|
Political and Social Conflicts
|
The process of creating
a democratic government during the American Revolution increased the prospect
of social conflict. During the colonial era, most political offices had been
occupied by wealthy men, and less wealthy Americans deferred to them. However,
as early as 1770 Philadelphia workers protested against high-powered men who
sought to control the political process with little regard for their
involvement. By 1776 the backcountry farmers of Mecklenburg County, North
Carolina, were instructing their representatives to the state’s constitutional
convention to “oppose everything that leans to aristocracy or power in the
hands of the rich and chief men exercised to the oppression of the poor.”
At first, influential
Patriots refused to cede power to the lower orders. They insisted that voting
and officeholding be restricted to propertied white men. Conservative Patriots
wanted to deny political rights to men who owned only a little property.
Nevertheless, the American
Revolution did undermine the control of the state legislatures by an oligarchy
of wealthy planters and merchants. In 1774 fewer than one in five members of
the assemblies had been artisans or yeoman farmers. After the war, men from
these social groups formed a majority in some Northern legislatures and a
powerful minority in the Southern assemblies. Claiming a “right to speak and
think for themselves,” artisans formed Mechanics Associations and elected
representatives from their own ranks. Yeoman farmers benefited from the
increased representation of backcountry regions under the new state
constitutions. Overall, the increased political activity of farmers and
artisans was significant.
E
|
Gender Inequalities
|
The democratic reforms
generated by the revolution were not fully extended to women. Women had not
taken an active role in politics during the colonial era. However, during the
revolution, educated upper-class women entered into political debate in private
conversations and, less frequently, in public letters to newspapers. These
women did not seek voting rights but some of them asked for a republican legal
order that would give women greater individual rights. Under English and
American common law, a woman was subject to the legal control of her father
until age 21 and to the legal control of her husband upon her marriage. This
meant that a married woman could not own property or make legal contracts for
herself and was virtually subject to her husband’s will. Despite the pleas of
Patriot women, including Abigail Adams, neither Congress nor the state
governments took significant steps to enhance the legal rights of their female
citizens.
Women continued to be
excluded from politics, as well. The state constitutions either restricted
suffrage (voting rights) to men or imposed property qualifications for voting
that effectively excluded married women. The New Jersey Constitution of 1776
did allow the vote to all free adult inhabitants worth £50, but when widows and
unmarried women began to exercise this right after 1800, new legislation in
1807 excluded women from the polls. See also Women’s Rights.
F
|
The Nature of the Revolution
|
The republican freedoms
won in the war against Great Britain and incorporated into the new state
constitutions made the United States a more democratic and a more equal polity.
However, the Patriot leaders who led the independence movement did not want a political
or a social revolution. The governments they founded did not attempt to alter
the existing unequal distribution of wealth or eliminate the barriers of class,
race, or gender status. Most of the benefits of political independence went to
men who were white and property owners.
Thus, the American uprising
against Britain was less a total revolution than a movement for home rule that
was led and ultimately controlled by a privileged minority. And yet the
American War of Independence shook up the existing society in profound ways.
The long war created a huge price inflation that made many people more
calculating, forcing some of them to embrace the market economy and others to
retreat into subsistence farming. It also caused the departure of thousands of
wealthy Loyalists, an event that altered the social structure. Moreover, the
Patriot doctrines of republican liberty led to the end of slavery in the North
and challenged its legitimacy in the South; prompted the political mobilization
of ordinary farmers and artisans; and raised fundamental questions about gender
roles.
Beyond these immediate
social changes, the upheaval brought a revolution in American political
thought. The people of the United States repudiated social hierarchy and
hereditary monarchy in favor of individual liberty and representative
republican government. Jefferson used Enlightenment natural law principles,
such as the right to life and liberty, as the foundation of the Patriots’
doctrine of popular sovereignty. Thus, he argued in the Declaration of
Independence in 1776 that “to secure these rights, governments are instituted
among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” These
principles—of individual rights and popular sovereignty—were truly
revolutionary and were among the Patriots’ most important legacies to future
generations.
No comments:
Post a Comment